What Are the Royal Navy’s SHL Assessments? (And How to Pass)



Officers in the United Kingdom's Royal Navy oversee and execute the military branch's many responsibilities in peacekeeping, national security, and defence.

The Royal Navy has recently entered into an agreement with SHL, a big-name distributor of psychometric and aptitude tests. SHL's Assessment Tests will now be used to inform promotion and assignment decisions for naval officers.

Read about the Royal Navy's SHL Tests, which skills they evaluate, and how to prepare.

Royal Navy SHL Assessment

One-Time Payment
Money Back Guarantee
  • Verify G
    • 2 Diagnostic Tests
    • 3 Full Simulations
    • 10 Focused Practice Sets
    • 3 In-Depth Study Guides
  • OPQ-32 Personality
    • 1 Simulation
    • 1 Practice Test
    • 1 Comprehensive Guide
  • Motivation Tests
    • PDF Guide & Single-Trait Practice

This page deals with promotional assessments. Recruits, read about the Defence Aptitude Test

Ira, SHL Assessments Expert at JobTestPrep
Have a question? Contact me at:

What Are the Royal Navy SHL Tests?

The Royal Navy SHL Assessments are an innovative method of assigning the naval force's large personnel pool to the numerous roles and positions across the organization.

Their purpose is to assess leadership capabilities in senior officers for selection and advancement.

To ensure optimal suitability between officer and role, The Royal Navy use one cognitive ability test and two behavioral and Leadership questionnaires. Let's review them!

Royal Navy General Ability Test

  • Question Format: Interactive
  • Number of Questions: 24
  • Time Limit: 36 Minutes

The General Ability Test (aka Verify G+) is the cognitive part of the assessment. It will measure your skills in three domains: numerical reasoning, inductive reasoning, and deductive reasoning.

What Can I expect?

SHL Numerical Questions typically deal with understanding charts and graphs, as well as the intuitive use of ratios, percentages, and basic operations. Deductive questions are all about drawing conclusions from and applying rules. Questions include organizing work schedules based on team members' limitations, as well as working with syllogisms. Lastly, Inductive reasoning focuses on understanding visual patterns and completing them, similar to the well-known Raven's Matrices Test.

Let's look at a sample numerical question:

Numerical Example from the Royal Navy Verify G+

Observe the following table and answer the question below:

Fork

  • Amount: 25
  • Price per unit: £3

Knife

  • Amount: 28
  • Price per unit: £3.5

Teaspoon

  • Amount: 26
  • Price per unit: £2.5

Tablespoon

  • Amount: -
  • Price per unit: 50p more than a knife

You recently moved and decided to buy new utensils. Calculate the percentage each type of utensil will cost you if you bought a total of 88 utensils. (rounding to the nearest whole number only in the last step).

*Use whole digits only.

Interactive Numerical Question for Royal Navy
  • Green = teaspoons
  • Blue = tablespoons
  • Orange = forks
  • Grey = knives

How would you fill in these blanks in the real test?

View Explanation

First, we can see that there is missing data regarding tablespoons, so to calculate the required percentages, we must first retrieve the relevant data:

Number of tablespoons purchased: 88-25-28-22=9
Price of single tablespoon: $3.5+$0.5=$4

Now that we have all of the data we need, we want to calculate the total cost of each utensil so we can calculate the total cost of all utensils and, through that, the percentage that each utensil accounts for.

Total cost of forks: 25*3=$75
Total cost of knives: 28*3.5=$98
Total cost of teaspoons: 26*2.5=$65
Total cost of tablespoons: 9*4=$36

Total cost of utensils: 75+98+65+36=$274

Now that we have calculated the cost of each utensil, we can calculate what percentage of the total cost each utensil is worth:

Fork cost percentage: (75/274)*100=27.37% ≈27%
Knife cost percentage: (98/274)*100=35.77% ≈36%
Teaspoon cost percentage: (65/274)*100=23.72% ≈24%

Note that we only need to calculate 3 percentages, and we can get the final percentage by subtracting the 3 we calculated from the 100% total.

Solution

Royal Navy Occupational Personality Questionnaire

  • Question Format: Forced-Choice
  • Number of Questions: 104
  • Duration: ~20 Minutes

The Occupational Personality Questionnaire is a personality assessment aimed at ranking test takers on 32 fundamental personality traits. For this reason, it is sometimes referred to as the OPQ32 or OPQ32r (r stands for response theory).

What Can I expect?

OPQ32 questions are in a forced-choice format. This means instead of ranking yourself on one trait at a time as in most personality tests,, you will be given three statements representing equally favorable or unfavorable traits. You will have to choose one that you feel represents you most. After making the choice, you must choose which of the remaining two statements better represents you. 

Let's look at an example:

OPQ Example from the Royal Navy Personality Test

Which statement describes you the MOST?

I usually resolve conflicts by listening to all sides, then making a decision.

I believe having a positive outlook can influence work performance.

If I hear about new technologies that can streamline my work, I usually check them out.

Of the remaining two statements, which one describes you the most?

View Explanation

"I usually resolve conflicts by listening to all sides, then making a decision."

  • Trait: Decision Making & Conflict Resolution (Part of the Persuasion & Influence dimension)
  • Ideal Roles: Unit commanders, operational planners, intelligence officers, and diplomatic liaisons—positions requiring sound judgment, the ability to mediate between conflicting interests, and decisive leadership under pressure.

"I believe having a positive outlook can influence work performance."

  • Trait: Optimism & Resilience (Part of the Emotional Stability dimension)
  • Ideal Roles: Morale officers, training commanders, special operations leaders, and battlefield commanders—roles where maintaining high morale, motivating troops, and handling stress effectively are critical.

"If I hear about new technologies that can streamline my work, I usually check them out."

  • Trait: Innovative & Change-Oriented (Part of the Adaptability & Flexibility dimension)
  • Ideal Roles: Cyber warfare officers, logistics and supply chain officers, intelligence analysts, and weapons development officers—positions requiring adaptability, a proactive approach to emerging technology, and strategic innovation to enhance military operations.

Royal Navy Motivational Questionnaire

  • Question Format: Likert Scale
  • Number of Questions: 150
  • Duration: ~25 Minutes

The Motivational Questionnaire (aka SHL MQ or MQM5) ranks officers on a set of 18 motivational factors. The idea behind this is that different individuals are motivated and empowered by different things. Having a role that fulfills you and pushes you forward will positively impact your delivery and performance.

What Can I expect?

The questions are in a Likert Scale format. This means that for each question, you will read a statement about something that motivates you. You will have to rank whether this statement is true for you on a five-point scale from "Highly Demotivating" to "Highly Motivating".

Here is an example:

MQ Example from the Royal Navy Motivation Test

How does this affect your motivation at work?

The ability to affect the professional advancement of other employees.

  • Very Demotivating
  • Demotivating
  • Neutral
  • Motivating
  • Very Motivating

Select your answer

View Explanation

This question relates to the Power motivation factor, one of 18 motivation factors assessed by the SHL MQM5.

The Power motivational factor describes how an authoritative position and ability to influence affect your motivation at work.

It is highly sought after in management positions but is considered far less desirable when it comes to team members or administrative roles.

As such, if you are applying to a management position, it is recommended to indicate Power-related statements as highly motivating.

Neutral or demotivating responses are recommended for positions requiring more rule compliance and cooperation.

Prepare to Ace the Royal Navy Leadership Assessments!

Using JobTestPrep's specially curated PrepPack, you get access to:

  • Full practice tests and test simulations
  • Focused practice to surgically improve specific skills
  • Thorough solutions and explanations for every question

More Sample Questions and Answers for Practice

Use the following samples to evaluate your readiness for the test:

Inductive Reasoning Example

Observe the following graphics::

Inductive Reasoning - Odd One Out

Which is the odd one out?

View Explanation

Every frame has four shapes (or shape groups).

In all frames, the shapes grow with the addition of the first shape each time.

However, in frame A, the shapes double twice as much as the previous shape. Therefore, the correct answer is A.

Distractors:

The shapes in frames B and C are ordered by size, which has no significance to the question since we do not look for rules broken by two frames. We look for rules broken only once.

Deductive Reasoning Example

Read about the team training programme:

Next month each team will spend four consecutive weekdays with an organizational psychologist for a team training and development session. Sessions cannot be scheduled at the same time.

Requirements

When does the Marketing department start and finish their training period?

SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT

27

28 29 30 31 1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8

9

10 11 12 13 14 15

16

17 18 19 20 21 22

23

24 25 26 27

28

1

2

View Explanation

The question asks you to select two dates, the start and finish dates of Marketing’s team training session.

Let’s break down the statements step by step:

First, integrate statements that refer to one another and create a list:

Product should be scheduled after HR: HR->Product

Data is before or after Product: Data-> Product or Product->Data.

Since you know HR has to be the team that immediately precedes Product, then the correct order would be Product->Data

Taken together, so far, we have HR->Product->Data – these teams should be scheduled immediately one after the other.

Second, organize possible lists:

The other two departments that are not scheduled yet are Marketing and Software development. According to Software Development’s statement, these two departments can’t be scheduled one after the other. Therefore, they will be in the first and last spots of the line.

The options are:

Marketing-> HR->Product->Data->Software Development

Or

Software Development-> HR->Product->Data >Marketing

Marketing is not available on the 5th, though, meaning they can’t be first in line.

As a result, Marketing will be the last team to do their training.

Third, choose the correct time frame

Counting every 4 consecutive weekdays, there are 5 slots:

(1) 1,4,5,6
(2) 7,8,11,12
(3) 13,14,15,18
(4) 19,20,21,22
(5) 25,26,27,28.

The last training session will be scheduled between the 25th and 28th, so these would be the first and last training days of the Marketing team.

Occupational Personality Questionnaire Example

Which statement describes you the MOST?

I like to do things my own way.

I recognise weal arguments.

I take care to follow procedures

Of the remaining two statements, which one describes you the most?

View Explanation

"I like to do things my own way."

  • Trait: Independence & Autonomy (Part of the Motivation & Drive dimension)
  • Ideal Roles: Special operations officers, intelligence officers, strategic planners, and unconventional warfare commanders—positions requiring independent thinking, adaptability, and the ability to operate effectively with minimal supervision.

"I recognize weak arguments."

  • Trait: Critical Thinking & Analytical Reasoning (Part of the Problem-Solving & Decision-Making dimension)
  • Ideal Roles: Military intelligence officers, legal advisors, operations analysts, and strategic command officers—roles where evaluating information, detecting flawed reasoning, and making sound tactical or strategic decisions are essential.

"I take care to follow procedures."

  • Trait: Rule Adherence & Discipline (Part of the Conscientiousness & Detail-Orientation dimension)
  • Ideal Roles: Logistics officers, aviation officers, security and compliance officers, and nuclear weapons officers—positions where strict adherence to protocols, safety procedures, and regulations is crucial for mission success and operational security.

Motivational Questionnaire Example

How does this affect your motivation at work?

Being encouraged to seek different opinions on something I have done.

  • Very Demotivating
  • Demotivating
  • Neutral
  • Motivating
  • Very Motivating

Select your answer

View Explanation

This question relates to a different motivational factor out of SHL’s 18 – Autonomy.

Autonomy relates to the need for individual work. Employees with Autonomy as a low motivation factor are in constant need for close monitoring and control.

Therefore, applicants for management positions are expected to have Autonomy as a highly motivating factor and should rank this statement as demotivating.

Applicants for team member positions will be wise to rank it as motivating.


FAQs

The United Kingdom’s Naval Service use SHL as a replacement for their earlier evaluation systems.

As with many military organizations, naval officers typically rotate between roles every few years. This creates a constant need for performance appraisal to inform promotion and reassignment decisions. Without an objective psychometric assessment, promotions can be based on irrelevant or subjective factors such as seniority, or favoritism.

According to Captain Mike Young, Leadership and Assessment Development Advisor for the Royal Navy, SHL helps decision-makers differentiate which officers are best suited for specific appointments. Captain Young also emphasized that the choice aligns with the Royal Navy’s core values, ensuring that integrity, emotional intelligence, and motivation are considered just as important as objective performance in career advancement decisions.


The Royal Navy use three different SHL Assessment Tests, covering personality traits, motivators, and cognitive ability. These tests are the Occupational Personality Questionnaire (aka the OPQ32r), the Motivational Questionnaire, and the General Ability Test (aka Verify G+).


Your commanding officers will receive a specially tailored report from SHL, which will aggregate information from all three tests. You will not be given access to this report, although you may be able to file a special request to see it.

You can better understand how SHL results are calculated on our SHL Results page.


On the Royal Navy SHL Assessments, you can always go back to fix or alter your previous choice, but no further than that.


During the SHL General Ability test, which includes numerical questions, you are allowed a calculator and a piece of scrap paper. This is because the test does not aim to measure your mental maths but rather to ascertain whether you are capable of numerical problem-solving. 


The SHL Assessments are designed to be competitive. They do not measure your ability to pass a minimum threshold. Instead, they rank test-takers against each other. Proper preparation can make a big difference.


Balancing honesty with professionalism in OPQ Personality tests can be challenging. To navigate this, separate your Work Self from your Home Self. While traits like procrastination on weekends or pranking friends are real, they’re irrelevant to the SHL test. Instead, focus on workplace behavior—team dynamics, alignment with company culture, and problem-solving skills. Highlighting your work personality ensures both honesty and success.